Text Version      
Montgomery County Maryland
Home | Translate  
 
Zoning Rewrite
Transit Master Plan
Council Grant Information
Shaping our Future Briefings
Reports & Other Documents
Zoning, Special Exceptions, Subdivision Processes
Phil Andrews, District 3 Roger Berliner, District 1 Marc Elrich, At-Large Valerie Ervin, District 5 Nancy Floreen, At-Large George Leventhal, At-Large Nancy Navarro, District 4 Craig Rice, District 2 Hans Riemer, At-Large
MONTGOMERY COUNTY COUNCIL

 Click to go to translation options TRANSLATE the Council Site Search Council 
Council News - Press Releases & Statements

Montgomery Council to Hold Public Hearing on Tuesday, June 11, on First Major Rewrite of Zoning Ordinance Since 1978
 
  • Release ID: 13-150
  • Release Date: 6/10/2013
  • Contact: Neil Greenberger 240-777-7939 or Delphine Harriston240-777-7931
  • From: Council Office
 

The Montgomery County Council will hold a public hearing at 7:30 p.m. on Tuesday, June 11, on the first major rewrite of the County Zoning Code since 1978. Among the goals of the most significant changes in 35 years will be to update all aspects of the ordinance, create more predictability in the standards and promote “green” land use practices.

The Council’s regular weekly meeting will begin at 9:30 a.m. in the Third Floor Hearing Room of the Council Office Building at 100 Maryland Ave. in Rockville. The morning session, five afternoon public hearings and the evening public hearing starting at 1:30 p.m. will be televised live by County Cable Montgomery (CCM—Cable Channel 6 on Comcast and RCN, Channel 30 on Verizon). The broadcast also will be streamed through the County Web site at www.montgomerycountymd.gov. The broadcast will be repeated starting at 9 p.m. on Friday, June 14.

At approximately 10:15 a.m., the Council is scheduled to take action on a hearing examiner’s report and recommendation regarding the application for reclassification of 54.3 acres of land located at 21901 Ridge Road in Germantown. The applicant—Theodore H. Butz—is seeking to have to property reclassified from the RE-2 Zone (single-family detached homes on two-acre lots) to the Planned Retirement Community Zone.

The property, which is located just north of Brink Road, would be developed with 140 age-restricted, single-family homes (at least 85 percent detached) and a small community center. The age restriction would limit residents to 50 years and older, and disabled relatives. The development would be called “The Courts at Clarksburg.”

The technical staff of the Maryland-National Capital Park and Planning Commission, in a reported dated Dec. 7, 2012, recommended denial of the application. On Dec. 20, the County Planning Board recommended approval of the application by a 5-0 vote.

The County’s hearing examiner has recommended approval of the application.

During the morning session, the Council also is expected to approve the re-appointment of Marye Wells-Harley to a second term on the County Planning Board. Her first term will expire on June 14.

One of the afternoon public hearings will concern Bill 11-13 that would establish a Commercial Property Assessed Clean Energy Program to assist qualifying commercial property owners to make energy improvements. The program also would establish a revolving loan fund to provide property owners loans under the program. Councilmember Roger Berliner is the chief sponsor of the bill.


The rewrite of the Zoning Cade has been in the works for five years.

On May 3, the Council received a proposed comprehensive rewrite of the code from the Planning Board. Most of the changes apply to non-residential (commercial, mixed-use and employment-related) zones. The public hearing will give residents the opportunity to discuss the desirability or undesirability of proposed allowable land uses in residential zones.

The full text of the proposed code and proposed zoning on property to implement the new code is available online at www.zoningmontgomery.org

The Council authorized the ordinance changes in 2008 when it approved the Planning Board’s work program with the following goals for the rewrite:

Update the ordinance—all aspects of the document, from the number of districts to the number of processes outlined in various sections.
Simplify all aspects of the document.
Improve the organization of the document.
Rationalize/update provisions to reflect the changing development climate with a greater emphasis on infill development.
Create predictability in the standards as well as the format.
Promote “green” land use policies.

The proposed draft completely restructures the current code. The current code is organized by major zoning classifications. There is a different land use table in every major section of the code. The revisions in the proposed draft define chapters by the form of regulation or function (e.g., land use, optional development, standard development, amendments). For example, the draft has a single “Uses and Use Standards” chapter, with a single land use table for all zones.

The draft ordinance has fewer zones than the current ordinance and places particular land use categories (e.g., newspaper stand, flower shop) into more general land use categories (e.g., retail/service). In the Commercial/Residential (C/R) and Employment zones, reducing the number of uses makes the zones generally more permissive than the current code. However, the proposed code would more directly regulate the design aspects of development in these zones.

The following are examples of other significant substantive changes:

Mixed-use and employment zones are consolidated, with the exception of the C/R, Life Science Center (LSC), Commercial/Residential/Town (CRT) and Commercial/Residential/Neighborhood (CRN) zones.
All floating zones—a zone that can be applied for by a single property owner—are new and clearly identified as floating zones.
The standards for the number of on-site parking in commercial zones are reduced in some instances and design standards are added. The parking reductions reflect the current needs for less parking and the emphasis of the use of public transit in transit accessible areas.
The amount of open space required in mixed-use and employment zones is generally reduced. The intent of reduced open space is to create walkable environments where activity sites are grouped closer together.
The process for reviewing and approving Local Map Amendments is simplified.

The one-family residential zones are retained with the same development standards. The names of the zones remain the same, except for:

· The R-150 (residential lots with 15,000 square feet) and RMH-200 (residential mobile homes) would be consolidated in the R-200 zone.

· RMH zone property would be consolidated into the R-60 zone.



                                                                             # # # #




Last edited: 12/23/2009  

Council Home
About the Council
Public Participation
Councilmembers
Phil Andrews
Roger Berliner
Marc Elrich
Valerie Ervin
Nancy Floreen
George Leventhal
Nancy Navarro
Craig Rice
Hans Riemer
Council Agenda
Committee Agenda
Packets & Meeting Summaries
Legislation & Resolutions

Bills
Resolutions
Zoning Text Amendments
Budget Update
Council Approves FY14 Operating Budget
Master Plans
Upcoming Public Hearings
Plans before Council
Completed Plans
Council Communications
Contact the Council
Council News
Listen to Council Sessions by Phone
View Council Sessions - Live and On Demand
Facebook
Twitter
YouTube
Council Photos
CCM (County Cable)