Text Version      
Montgomery County Maryland
Home | Translate  
OCP Home
A-Z Consumer Advice
Advisory Committee on Consumer Protection
Common Ownership Communities
Consumer Alerts and News
Consumer Compass (Cable TV Show)
Domestic Workers
Energy and Environmental Advocacy
Estimated Property Tax Calculator
FAQs
Filing Consumer Complaints
Licensing & Registration
Merchant Complaints
New Home Builder Search
Publications
Services
Survey
Volunteer
Contact Us
 
 
 
 
 

OFFFICE OF CONSUMER PROTECTION                 240.777.3636 


CCOC Case Summary
 

Case #763-O, McDowell v. Cloverleaf Center II Condominium (Stevens, Gannon, Vergagni).

Shortly after buying her townhome in 1997, the homeowner (HO) installed security bars on several windows, claiming the homeowner association (HOA) gave her oral permission to do so. In 2004, the HOA formally demanded that she remove the bars and in 2005 the HOA board ruled that the HO was in violation of the rules and fined her $150 plus $10 per day until she removed the bars. After a public hearing, the Commission ruled that: 1. the rule against security bars was valid and enforceable; 2. the rule required that the HO receive written permission to make changes, which the HO did not have; and 3. the HO must remove the bars from the exterior of the home. However, the Commission also determined that because the HOA had not taken any action on the violation for 7 years, it was unreasonable to charge the HO any fines and it ordered the HOA to refund all fines she paid. The Commission further denied the HOA's request for attorney's fees because the HO had a right to appeal the board's decision to the Commission. 

Last edited: 12/11/2012